Helicopter Route Charts? USA?

Вопросы, свзанные с обучением на вертолете.

Модераторы: smixer, lt.ak, vova_k, Misha

Сообщение
Автор
Jan
R.I.P.
Сообщения: 8712
Зарегистрирован: 16 апр 2007, 17:37
Member of AOPA: No
Откуда: ZZZZ

#16 Сообщение Jan » 03 ноя 2008, 19:13

Вот теперь понятно..

Аватара пользователя
lt.ak
Не Гуру
Сообщения: 6573
Зарегистрирован: 19 авг 2008, 02:29

#17 Сообщение lt.ak » 10 ноя 2008, 03:45

Jan писал(а):Т.е. они обязательны или рекомендованы?
только заметил этот thread.

FAA уже высказалось по поводу charts на борту ... вот прямая цитата

The term "charts" is not found in the FAA's Part 91 regulations (other than for large and turbine-powered multiengine airplanes in 91.503[a]). The specific FAA regulation, FAR 91.103 "Preflight Actions," states that each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight. What is not specifically addressed in the regulation is a requirement for charts. You should always carry a current chart for safety's sake. An expired chart will not show new frequencies or newly constructed obstructions, some of which could be tall enough to be a hazard along your route of flight.


The only FAA/FAR requirements that pertain to charts are:
Title 14 CFR section 91.503[a] (Large and Turbojet powered aircraft)
Title 14 CFR section 135.83 (Air Carriers-Little Airplane)
Title 14 CFR section 121.549 (Air Carrier-Big Airplanes)

The FAA has rendered interpretations that have stated the foregoing. The subject of current charts was thoroughly covered in an article in the FAA's July/August 1997 issue of FAA Aviation News. That article was cleared through the FAA's Chief Counsel's office. In that article the FAA stated the following:
"You can carry old charts in your aircraft."
"It is not FAA policy to violate anyone for having outdated charts in the aircraft."
"Not all pilots are required to carry a chart." "91.503..requires the pilot in command of large and multiengine airplanes to have charts." "Other operating sections of the FAR such as Part 121 and Part 135 operations have similar requirements."
..."since some pilots thought they could be violated for having outdated or no charts on board during a flight, we need to clarify an important issue. As we have said, it is NOT FAA policy to initiate enforcement action against a pilot for having an old chart on board or no chart on board." That's because there is no regulation on the issue.

..."the issue of current chart data bases in handheld GPS receivers is a non-issue because the units are neither approved by the FAA or required for flight, nor do panel-mounted VFR-only GPS receivers have to have a current data base because, like handheld GPS receivers, the pilot is responsible for pilotage under VFR.
"If a pilot is involved in an enforcement investigation and there is evidence that the use of an out-of-date chart, no chart, or an out-of-date database contributed to the condition that brought on the enforcement investigation, then that information could be used in any enforcement action that might be taken."

[выделено мной]
AIM 4-1-9 (g)(1) ... "Traffic in the area, please advise" is not a recognized Self-Announce Position and/or Intention phrase and should not be used under any condition.

Failure to comply with this warning will result in future warnings.

Jan
R.I.P.
Сообщения: 8712
Зарегистрирован: 16 апр 2007, 17:37
Member of AOPA: No
Откуда: ZZZZ

#18 Сообщение Jan » 16 ноя 2008, 00:26

Нашел такие-же карты по Лондону, Франкфурту и .. Москве.. Оказывается, Правительство Москвы активно разрабатывало вопрос о возможности полетов на вертолетах над территорией Москвы. Есть схемы с промерами высоты, планами площадок и прочего. Но - проект 2000 года. С тех пор все изменилось. И, в случае чего вдруг - все придется делать заново.

Ответить

Вернуться в «Вертолет - учимся летать»